Large Mobile Devices: Your Car

What do you think about a car as a large mobile device? It can be personalized, although changing colors are a bit more difficult. It can be built with a mobile phone, handles mp3, plays DVDs, and navigation via GPS. Cars are now starting to provide bluetooth connections, and even the 2005 Audi A4 even has a 2 SD slots behind the navigation system to play your mp3s.




So with all the extensions, controls, and sensors, why are we not protecting it? In a recent Reuters article, car makers are starting to get concerned about the car “catching a cold” or a software virus. What if the radio was disabled? Fuel gauge has an incorrect readout? Could you blame a speeding ticket on the car because it had a “speedometer virus?” It just goes to show that even things we use everyday, are electronic, use software, and are becoming connected. The BMW iDrive uses Microsoft software as the underlying OS. I could forsee in the near future you download driver and software updates for each component of your car via the Bluetooth, or cellular phone connection, maybe even the satellite radio (XM or Sirius) connection?



Maybe when we wash our cars, we could apply a coating of protectant against bugs and viruses. :) Somehow I think Symantec and McAfee are exploring the possibilities of moving into the automotive industry.

Sprint MBA – Consulting for Mobile

Sprint announced their Mobile Business Assessment (MBA) as a way to compete in the Professional Services arena against the heavyweights such as Accenture and IBM. Earlier this year, Cisco also developed a group for Mobile Wireless consulting. Is this posturing or real help? Both companies come from different backgrounds and they both have a lot to gain. Both have claimed to be vendor neutral and in my estimation, are really starting to believe the IBM-way of doing business (sell the hardware and software at or below cost and make the margins on service and support). Their target market, enterprises, have been laggards in adopting mobile wireless technology, but firm believers in remote access via broadband, corporate mobile plans, and phone cards. What are they waiting for? Why hasn’t the field force been armed with mobile phones linked in real-time to the enterprise applications we have been clamoring about?

My opinion is complexity. Wireless is a technology, mobility is a state of being. Indeed there are several wireless technologies, service providers racing to get their networks up, deployed, and eagerly awaiting customers to sign up and use up time and bandwidth. WiFi, WiMax, Zigbee, Bluetooth, GPRS, the list goes on and on. It’s my hope that Sprint will focus on provide point solutions rather than overarching, broad sweeping wireless solutions which create more waste than good. We’ll be watching the Case Studies and white papers.

Mobile with UV Protection

We want to push the envelope with the wearable mobile device, Motorola finally did it. Teaming up with Oakley, they have launched the RAZRWire sunglasses/bluetooth headset combo. Available through Cingular Wireless in August, 2005, this should definitely turn some heads, although perhaps in awkwardness instead of a double-take.

A couple of negatives regarding this product. 1. Unless you’re the Blues Brothers, you cannot use this inside. 2. If you sunglasses break, you cannot use the bluetooth piece separately; it won’t stay in your ear. 3. If you lose your sunglasses, you probably loose the headset too. 4. It’s still bluetooth, so I’m sure bluejacking will occur at some point. While this is not the last of bluetooth headsets paired with other fashion accessories, it’s certainly a step in the right direction of fulfilling those wanting to be on the fashion edge of technology.

Mobiles: Petri dishes for viruses

Gartner recently published a survey that mobile viruses and worms will not pose a significant threat until 2007. If it is not significant now, does that mean we should ignore it? The year when there is a bad flu season, do you wait to get the flu vaccine? Typically you try and prevent it as much as you can.


While there have been intermittent outbreaks of viruses targeted at mobiles, I predict that it won’t be long before it becomes commonplace to have virus protection on your mobile. And it’s not just for smart phones and business subscribers; everyone can benefit from having this implemented sooner than later.So why hasn’t the industry been more proactive about this? A quick check at the big players, Symantec, McAfee and Trend Micro and you see their mobile anti-virus offering is rather buried. I’m sure that their agendas are focused on consumer PCs and enterprise customers, but how can you ignore 1B mobile phones in the world. This is the year where they begin to outnumber PCs in the world!

And if the other predictions are true, there will be 3B mobiles by 2009. So what are the other issues stifling this innovation? Consumers and cost. Consumers while they value their mobile more than their personal computer, just seem to realize their attachment to and amount of data that could be lost should their phone be corrupted (remember, it’s a tiny computer, not a phone anymore). As storage on these devices begin to challenge MP3 players (1GB flash cards), you start to realize that all those images, texts, ringers, and games that you spend money on, could all be lost in the blink of an eye. Compound that with the added problem that subscribers use their mobile as their contact book (typically not transferring that data to their computer or paper) and this should start to make people cringe.

So what about cost? The last couple computers I purchased all had trial versions of some anti-virus program pre-installed. After 30 or 90 days it would ask me to purchase the full version with 1 year of updates. Would it be hard for the handset makers to team up and do the same? But what would consumers be willing to pay for client software? Currently, Symantec charges about $40USD, while F-Secure is about $26USD. At that rate, that would probably be the most expensive software download I would purchase to date. What happened to volume adoption and understand the subscriber’s behavior, etc, etc? If you wanted volume adoption and a lucrative market segment, why not charge $12USD, then the same each year for updates? This leads into the discussion about making this a data service. For about $1USD/month, this could be a significant boost in revenue for a mobile operator [Hey Vodafone, how about an extra $155M USD/month -- how you like them apples?]. They all want to find ways to increase ARPU and deploy additive services, why not this one? They could also bundle it into their current data plans as a way to differentiate into the market.

The downside for the mobile operator is liability. There would have to be some strong guarantees in place or lots of loopholes in order to stay out of courts and settlements should anyone slip through the cracks and become an infected victim.

To parallel the flu vaccine: consumers demand it, pharmaceutical companies need to make it, even though there is not very much money to be made.
Mobile Anti-Virus: This is because in the event of an outbreak, infections of the mobile-kind, could potentially spread significantly faster with less reaction time to innoculate devices and even the network. So don’t hesitate, just educate and execute.

Mobile Video on Slo-Mo

Is Mobile Video all it’s cracked up to be? A recent study performed by In-Stat stated that only one in eight people are interested in video on their mobile device. There is definitely hype about using more data intensive services (such as streaming video or video conferencing) on your mobile device — but is this merely just a vision of a dream that has yet to become reality. While those in Asia and some places in Europe have the service and the handsets what is the real uptake? I don’t think those in Japan or South Korea are now chatting using video conferencing on their mobile. I also don’t believe that they are glued to their phones watching TV dramas, sitcoms or the news reports and giving up on their plasma TVs.

So what’s the problem? Cost? Network? Services? Well, cost is always an intial barrier when it comes to new technology. The early adopters probably use it to show off to their friends, just like showing off their latest gadget, faceplate or ringer. Is it a network issue? Well, if you are a 3G network, then no. But others using EDGE or 1xRTT, it’s almost there. The encoding and data stream probably masks the lackluster quality. Otherwise, if you are watch ESPN Sportscenter, the highlights reel might be a bit choppy. Remember RealPlayer version 1? We’ll get there with mobile, it will just take a few versions. What I think the real problem is, is the social and cultural aspects of video. While The Jetsons had videophones, but it’s human nature to hide where you are or how you look. One of the best applications is to watch streaming video while taking public transportation. But P2P video? We are still a long way off.

Another aspect is if we can truly find the sweet spot for video other than entertainment value (ie. showing off to your friends and neighbors). I can see executive of corporations using this format to reach their mobile and remote workers. I fully expect advertising in some form to be on a mobile. Hopefully mobile operators can customize advertising that links to monetizable links both in the virtual and physical realm. Another idea would be to PPV (pay per view) video for entertainment, financial, world events, and sports highlights. The instant gratification nature of mobile video is what people should be focusing on. That is probably the next killer app for mobile.

Nokia on the N-track

Back in April, Nokia announced the N91 phone, part of the N-Series. Though this device will not be released until the end of 2005, it certainly could not come at a better time. Music services are started to pop-up all over, even in North America, and Nokia needs to continue to gain ground over traditional rivals Motorola and SonyEricsson and powerhouse Samsung. To thwart Microsoft is not enough on the OS and device side, they must also put up their guard against Apple and their Motorola partnership.

Apple is set to report their earning’s results today and analysts predict that the iPod and the iTunes music store is a significant portion of their revenue mix. While rumors continue to fly about the iTunes phone from Motorola, I certainly think that Steve Jobs has the wherewithal to pull off an Apple smartphone. Microsoft keeps plugging away, but Apple takes their time, cautiously watching and plotting. This time however, the mistakes from the Newton have been learnt and the iPod is an unbelieveable success. The iPod Photo, is also another hint that other media types will be profitable and further extend the life of the device. Hmmm, I’m thinking, perhaps podcasting video?All we need now is for Nokia to keep up the development of flip phones such as the Nokia 6170.

Service Tracks need to be laid quicker
At the same time, we need to get more companies to launch their own services that will work in the mobile environment and that can potentially get around direct selling to mobile operators. Music download services, Location-based services, mobile payment — all this needs to happen instead of being hyped by the media. Lots of work needs to be done and the mobile operators should be more willing and active to get these services deployed at reasonable costs. We will all benefit, just like we have on ringers, images, games, and more.

Customized — With Vinyl

Vinyl for my LPs. Vinyl for my car. Now to protect those most cherished devices, vinyl for my phone! I ran across this site from a friend on mine who saw my posts of Accessories. I guess all those old LPs and car dashboards have been recycled to protect my mobile.

Once you select the model mobile you have, there are a lot of choices you can choose from as the screenshot above shows. Alternatively, for an additional $4.95, you an customized it with your own graphic. I have ordered mine, so it will be on it’s way. I’ll comment more when I get it in the mail. I think the variety of graphics as well as customized ones definitely beats out plastic face plate covers. For about the same price and probably more durable and scratch resistant.